A. Motion for Order Compelling Disclosure or Discovery. A party, upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected thereby, may apply for an order compelling disclosure or discovery as follows.
1. Appropriate Court. An application for an order to a party may be made to the court in the county in which the action is pending, or, in matters relating to a deposition, to the court in the county where the deposition is being taken. An application for an order to a person who is not a party shall be made to the court in the county where the discovery is being, or is to be, taken.
a. If a party fails to make a disclosure required by Rule 49 or 50, any other party may move to compel disclosure and for appropriate sanctions.
b. If a deponent fails to answer a question propounded or submitted under Rule 57 or 58, or a corporation or other entity fails to make a designation under Rule 57(B)(6) or 58(A), or a party fails to answer an interrogatory submitted under Rule 60, or if a party, in response to a request for inspection submitted under Rule 61, fails to respond that inspection will be permitted as requested or fails to permit inspection as requested, the discovering party may move for an order compelling an answer, or a designation, or an order compelling inspection in accordance with the request. When taking a deposition on oral examination, the proponent of the question may complete or adjourn the examination before applying for an order.
c. No motion brought under this rule will be considered or hearing scheduled thereon unless a statement of the moving party is included in the motion certifying that, after personal consultation and good faith efforts to do so, counsel have been unable to satisfactorily resolve the matter.
3. Evasive or Incomplete Disclosure, Answer, or Response. For purposes of this rule an evasive or incomplete disclosure, answer, or response is to be treated as a failure to disclose, answer, or respond.
4. Expenses and Sanctions.
a. If the motion is granted or if the disclosure or requested discovery is provided after the motion was filed, the court shall, after affording an opportunity to be heard, require the party or deponent whose conduct necessitated the motion or the party or attorney advising such conduct or both of them to pay the moving party the reasonable expenses incurred in making the motion, including attorneys’ fees, unless the court finds that the motion was filed without the movant’s first making a good faith effort to obtain the disclosure or discovery without court action, or that the opposing party’s nondisclosure, response, or objection was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.
b. If the motion is denied, the court may enter any protective order authorized under Rule 53 and shall, after affording an opportunity to be heard, require the movant or the attorney filing the motion or both of them to pay to the party or deponent who opposed the motion the reasonable expenses incurred in opposing the motion, including attorneys’ fees, unless the court finds that the making of the motion was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.
c. If the motion is granted in part and denied in part, the court may enter any protective order authorized under Rule 53 and may, after affording an opportunity to be heard, apportion the reasonable expenses incurred in relation to the motion among the parties and persons in a just manner.
B. Failure to Comply with Order.
1. Sanctions by court in county where deposition is taken. If a deponent fails to be sworn or to answer a question after being directed to do so by the court in the county in which the deposition is being taken, the failure may be considered a contempt of that court.
2. Sanctions by court in which action is pending. If a party or an officer, director, or managing agent of a party or a person designated under Rule 57(B)(6) or 58(A) to testify on behalf of a party fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, including an order made under paragraph A or Rule 63, the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others the following:
a. an order that the matters regarding which the order was made or any other designated facts shall be taken to be established for the purposes of the action, in accordance with the claim of the party obtaining the order;
b. an order refusing to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims or defenses, or prohibiting that party from introducing designated matters in evidence;
c. an order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party;
d. in lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, an order treating as a contempt of court the failure to obey any orders, except an order to submit to a physical or mental examination;
e. a party who fails to comply with an order under Rule 63(A) requiring that party to produce another for examination is subject to the sanctions listed in subdivisions 2(a), (b), and (c), unless the party failing to comply shows that that party is unable to produce such person for examination.
In lieu of any of the foregoing orders or in addition thereto, the court shall require the party failing to obey the order or the attorney advising that party or both to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, caused by the failure, unless the court finds that the failure was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.
C. Failure to Disclose; False or Misleading Disclosure; Untimely Disclosure.
1. A party who fails to timely disclose information required by Rule 49 or 50 shall not, unless such failure is harmless, be permitted to use as evidence at trial, at a hearing, or in support of a motion, the information or the testimony of a witness not disclosed, except by leave of court for good cause shown. A party or attorney who makes a disclosure pursuant to Rule 49 or 50 that the party or attorney knew or should have known was inaccurate or incomplete and thereby causes an opposing party to engage in investigation or discovery, shall be ordered by the court to reimburse the opposing party for the cost, including attorneys’ fees, of such investigation or discovery. In addition to or in lieu of these sanctions, the court on motion of a party or on the court’s own motion, and after affording an opportunity to be heard, may impose other appropriate sanctions, which may include any of those authorized under subdivisions B(2)(a), (b), and (c).
2. A party seeking to use information that that party first disclosed later than thirty (30) days before trial must obtain leave of court by motion, supported by affidavit, to extend the time for disclosure. Such information shall not be used unless the motion establishes and the court finds:
a. that the information would be allowed under the standards of subdivision C(1), notwithstanding the short time remaining before trial; and
b. that the information was disclosed as soon as practicable after its discovery.
3. A party seeking to use information that that party first disclosed during trial must obtain leave of court by motion, supported by affidavit, to extend the time for disclosure. Such information shall not be used unless the motion establishes and the court finds:
a. that the information could not have been discovered and disclosed earlier even with due diligence; and
b. that the information was disclosed immediately upon its discovery.
D. Failure to Disclose Unfavorable Information. A party’s or attorney’s knowing failure to timely disclose damaging or unfavorable information, as required pursuant to Rules 49 and 50 or in response to discovery propounded pursuant to these rules, shall be grounds for imposition of sanctions, in the court’s discretion, up to and including dismissal of the claim or defense.
E. Electronically Stored Information. Absent exceptional circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide electronically stored information lost as a result of routine, good faith operation of an electronic information system.