In Lehn v. Al-Thanayyan, the Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed the family court’s determination of parenting time, the cash bond it imposed against Father to exercise parenting time internationally, and its award of attorney’s fees.
In Davis v. Davis, the Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed the family court’s evidentiary ruling to admit as evidence a Court Appointed Advisor’s report and testimony.
In Berrier v. Rountree, the Arizona Court of Appeals remanded a family court’s interstate parenting time determination to be reheard as a relocation pursuant to A.R.S. § 25-408.
In Amadore v. Lifgren, the Arizona Court of Appeals vacated (1) the effective dates the family court imposed for modification of child support and spousal maintenance and (2) the family court's decision to reduce prospective child support to offset overpayment of previous support. The parties were divorced by default decree in 2013. It awarded Mother $2,000 per month of indefinite
In Barron v. Barron, the Arizona Court of Appeals reversed the family court’s parenting time determination because it was based on impermissible presumptions about equal parenting time and gender.